I didn’t see any need to panic after the opener against Cincinnati, or early last season. There’s no need to pull any punches after this one though, as today’s loss to Syracuse was by far the worst the football team has looked since the disasterous 2004 season. I thought that there was a chance that Rutgers would come out flat today, but never expected at all to lose, and in this kind of lopsided fashion to just a completely decimated roster. Just when the team started to be hitting their stride on the year, this one was an uppercut right in the glass jaw. Suddenly, heading to Louisville next week doesn’t look nearly as boring, faced with the crucial question of how Rutgers is going to pick themselves up and respond after such a tough loss.
Reading everything coming out of Syracuse over the past week, all I could do was react with incredulity. Really? Marrone really said that Syracuse was looking at this one as their bowl game? Unfortunately, it looks like the Rutgers football team may have shared my lack of enthusiasm, coming out completely flat and uninspired in this one. Marrone’s troops lived up to his promise, going absolutely full throttle and showing no quarter. Well, message received. Forrest Gump isn’t roaming the Orange sidelines anymore. Rutgers is no longer in a position where they can fall down 14-0, and laugh it off on the way to another blowout win.
Well, guess we can write off Malcolm Cater with this one, and the SU program will be able recruit some in the metro area again. Rutgers football has been through worse, but it’s awfully troubling to see a loss like this in year nine. It’s not the end of the world; let the Syracuse fans crow all they want for the next year, but we’ve come back from worse. They’ll be as full of hubris as I was going into the game, crowing about all the parallels about how Rutgers stunned Syracuse 10 years ago, signifying the early stages of their downfall under Pasqualoni. No, playing a better SOS didn’t have squat to do with the end result today. Syracuse showed up and Rutgers didn’t, and to imply anything otherwise unfairly attributes away the credit from how tremendous SU looked today, and of how poorly the Knights laid an egg.
Let’s just get this out of the way right now. Rutgers isn’t going anywhere. I’m troubled that the football program is so maddeningly bipolar, but that is what it is at this point. Rutgers fans should have long come to terms with this kind of inconsistency. I want to walk into parkway traffic right now, as as I imagine everydown else does. Tom Savage is just a true freshman, and he finally looked like one in what was his worst game of the year. Anyone would have looked poorly with such a piss-poor performance by the offensive line. Anthony Davis? Dead to me. Let him go and steal money from some NFL team. Talent only goes so far. Rutgers would be better off with Forst or Stapes, or anyone who actually gives a damn when the games aren’t on ESPN prime time.
What I took from today, more than anything else, is that you can only live and die on a turnover margin for so long. After a while, the well runs dry, and the best way to succeed on the gridiron is to do it the old-fashioned way. You can only win on pure emotion for so long either. Both are fleeting, and can always depart at the worst moments.
In many ways, this one was an alternate-universe (i.e., evil, goateed) answer to the victory over USF, or even the UConn win. In both games, the opponent came out fired up, with absolutely everything on the line. If Rutgers can set the tone early and destroy their confidence, great. USF destroyed Syracuse a few months back, but they absolutely packed it in from the getgo in Piscataway. Now, when that team has everything to play for, and can make a few things happen early, they start to believe in themselves, build some momentum, and their confidence becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I can’t say enough good things about how the Orange coaching staff schemed today. Doug Marrone brought the aggression, and even if it backfired with the onside kick, his charges persevered, and didn’t wilt when Rutgers tried to make a game for it. You would have expected that Syracuse would feature a heavy dose of Delone Carter up the gut on the day, but Rutgers had no answer at all for their misdirections and option pitches, which is just mind-boggling, considering how offense they see the service academies. It was the perfect plan to take advantage of the aggressiveness and overpursuit of the Rutgers D. Not only did having to focus against the run take them out of their element, but our best strength was turned against the team having to contend with all that razzle dazzle.
It’s not what they may have expected, but they’ve bottled up similar gameplans before. And that defense, did the teams secretly switch uniforms before the game? Wasn’t Rutgers supposed to be the pinnacle of disguising pressure? Syracuse did an amazing job on all three points, their guys executed, and Troy Nunes eat your heart out, because Doug Marrone is an absolute freakin’ magician for turning their offensive line into a downright strength. I just look at how dreadful our line has looked this year, when they were returning everyone, and looked to be finally coming together, and can only shake my head. Any hopes for a, quote-unquote, “good” season are dead (well, shocking West Virginia would be nice, but wouldn’t entirely make up for this), and line coach Kyle Flood and company are the biggest scapegoats.
What Rutgers need today was to go up early with a score or two, take that damned Dome out of the picture (if only Fred Hill could similarly revive the RAC), and rattle the Orange into the same battered, lackadaisicall helplessness that Greg Robinson embodied in all aspects. A few early bounces, and that could very well have happened. Coach Schiano may have been counting on it, because this time, he didn’t seem to have an answer. Tim Brown played well enough, returning after an injury scare, and Mohamed Sanu was brilliant on direct snap plays, but it wasn’t enough. Not when Tom Savage is getting knocked to the turf on every play, and giving up turnovers.
I killed the defense above. To be fair, they got nearly nothing in the way of help from the offense, but the sheer failure to make adjustments was devastating. Clearly, the defense does one thing really, really well. When they’re allowed to concentrate on that, and play to their strengths (with a lead), they’re as good as anyone out there. In other contexts, not so much. I don’t know if Louisville has the personnel to whip up this sort of gameplan next week, and they sure as hell won’t have the element of surprise on their side this time. West Virginia can, good lord they can with their athletes, even as they go with more of a passing spread this year. I’m having nightmares just thinking about it right now. The only solace is that Rutgers usually doesn’t look that bad against teams with option elements when, important caveat here, they’re actually going into the game expecting that.
Kicker San San Te was injured late in the first half on a missed long field goal. The Syracuse defender hit him after the snap, although no penalty was called. Syracuse dominated in all aspects of the game, and you can’t go whining about the calls with such a lopsided result, but having another chance to cut the score margin at that point conceivably could have swung the game’s momentum. Lost in the misery to come over the next few days is that the special teams units did play well, with a couple of big returns, multiple blocks, and a big day from Teddy Dellaganna. His strength is with his strong leg, and his weakness is with directional punting. Ironically, those factors make him look better when nothing else is going right. With Rutgers battling from poor field position all day long, and playing in a Dome where the elements aren’t a factor, Dellaganna was about as good as Syracuse’s All-American punter in Rob Long. Teddy gave the team great field position in several instances; Rutgers couldn’t capitalize. Syracuse didn’t let them.
Hey, as long as we’re in the business of pointing fingers and looking for scapegoats over the next few days, can I castigate Beat Visitor for taunting the blogpoll gods with that #19 vote last week, undoubtedly incurring the wrath of the football gods? It was him! He did it! He blew it all up!
Me, I may have been gone a bit too far Icarus-like myself, getting too close to the sun with the comedy posts and whatnot over the past week. Clearly, the football gods were not amused at my TNIAAM-aping, and went about switching our lucks on the day. Now, I’m in sports hell. Rutgers football blew it on the day, the basketball team can barely beat Drexel, the Devils cooled off, the Giants are staring down the abyss tomorrow. And oh yeah, I’m stuck with the Nets too, at least until they grant merciful release by stealing a bunch of Brooklyn taxpayers’ money. They can’t even get that part right!
Speaking of Mr. Keeley, I always thought the ironic part of his infamous “Quest for Toronto” series of posts was that, because of how awful the Big East’s bowl tie-ins are, it’s actually disturbingly difficult to land a half decent bid. Even when UConn is doing their part for the conference against Notre Dame (which I now cannot enjoy). Well, Sean may just end up getting his wish, albeit not in a way that he may have originally intended. On the day, a Syracuse victory may just have ended up sending a team to Toronto for the holidays. Of course, the conference could still work out some sort of swap with the Motor City Bowl.
Now, if you will excuse me, I can’t type any longer as men in white coats just kicked down the front door, and are securing the restraints and straight jacket as I type this very sentence. Hopefully, they can take me off to a happy and magical place where I can forget all about the events that just transpired.
23 responses so far ↓
JerseyJoe // November 21, 2009 at 7:37 pm |
Losses happen. But not being competitive in games is unacceptable. And that falls squarely on the coaching….you would think by now, they would have figured that out.
We’ll all know this Rutgers program has turned a corner when they win a big game and follow it up by beating the teams they are expected to.
Josh Bucher // November 21, 2009 at 10:01 pm |
I didn’t watch this game because I was studying, but from what my girlfriend told me and your post, I’m happy I missed this one. The frustration would have taken years off of my life.
nik12 // November 21, 2009 at 10:02 pm |
I really thought this team turned the corner with the UConn win and the blowout against USF. Nope. Hopefully they wake up next week against Louisville. This team’s not good enough to sleepwalk through any games.
Cuse Fan // November 21, 2009 at 10:16 pm |
“I’m sticking to my guns here – Rutgers/Syracuse won’t be very close. Injuries hurt the Orange this year, but the end result probably wasn’t ever going to be much different. At least they have an excuse now. ”
You didn’t just get punked by the 113th ranked team in the nation, you got punked by their third string. You and your readers now need to just pipe down – you are not a national power, you are not even relevant. You had Ray Rice and a decent line for three years – its now over. And by the way – keep commenting on the state of SU basketball – like you did a couple of days ago- its just so precious.
Cuse Fan // November 21, 2009 at 10:21 pm |
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention – you’re prediction was right – it wasn’t “very close”, was it?.
Sec117 // November 21, 2009 at 10:36 pm |
It’s Year 9. I’m tired of this crap. We have a coach that was great to get from 2-9 to 7-5. After several years of that, all I can say is whoopie-damn-doo. For $2 million a year and a top 20 coaching salary, RU deserves more bang for our bucks.
Today was the final nail in the coffin — I have NO confidence that he is ever going to get us to a BE championship. He (and his kids) just lack the IT to focus for 12 games. All of this “one game season” is just BS for annual failures since 2006. No “process” should take 10 years.
He’s lucky that Fred Hill is still on the RU payroll, because at least by that measure, Schiano is semi-competent.
R-year // November 22, 2009 at 12:21 am |
All of you are delusional. This Orange fan comes on are and starts taunting us because of one game, and thinks his team is the center of the universe. You deserve tons of credit for winning, but don’t think that you’re team somehow became a relevent team in one night. You’ll need next season to prove that. And if you do turn around so fast, then congrats to you.
RU fans are actually trying to spin something positive here. Football is done in P-way folks. I’m so glad I’m graduating so I don’t have to keep wondering what all the millions wasted on this coach are actually being spent upon. What a joke…
wskrides // November 22, 2009 at 9:38 am |
Sec117… as “harsh” as your comment sounds, it seems you may be right on the money.
yesterday was inexcusable and pathetic.
bs // November 22, 2009 at 10:53 am |
When did I say anything about being a national power?
Please, broken clocks like Cuse Fan have been trying to bury Rutgers football for years. I’ve never said that Marrone can’t turn Syracuse around. Just don’t think it’ll have much of an impact on Rutgers, and it won’t. They played inspired football, but still have a long way to go before doing that every game. Surely Syracuse BB fans know after LeMoyne that you can’t overreact to one game.
James Allen // November 22, 2009 at 11:56 am |
There is a pattern and it falls right in the coaches lap: after a big Thursday conference win, they fall on their face the following week. It all started when they didn’t show up in Cincy after the big Louisville win in 2006. Then they got drubbed at home against West Virginia in 2007 after they beat the No. 2 ranked South Florida (one of the softest No. 2’s in history, but that’s another post), again, a Thursday night ESPN game. There was no comparible situation last year, but this year, as soon as they win a Thursday night game against a ranked team, and in the process get themselves ranked (in the AP anyway) they don’t show up again.
This is why I wasn’t all that surprised by yesterday’s result. This team, especially this coach, lets these nationally televised wins go right to their heads.
This team has some building blocks or the future (we all know the man can recruit) but I just don’t have much faith in this coach to get it done on the field. Games like yesterday do nothing but confirm my concerns.
Gregg // November 22, 2009 at 12:33 pm |
Syracuse won their “bowl game” rather convincingly! Now we have to make sure Louisville doesn’t win theirs next week.
Beat Visitor // November 22, 2009 at 1:42 pm |
You don’t need to blame me, je m’accuse for my taunting of the BlogPoll gods.
I’m also at fault for telling my radio at the end of the first half, “if they score this touchdown, we’ll come back and win.” So what happened as soon as I said that? Penalties and sacks.
So take it easy on Tom Savage and Greg Schiano. It’s all my fault.
Brian Harrison // November 23, 2009 at 3:46 am |
Hey man, I told you about our good offensive line. The were on, and somehow we stole a defense from another team along the way. Tough game from the RU perspective. Take some comfort in knowing that I felt that exact way last week when ‘Cuse lost to a Louisville team we should have beat. I guess we’ll see if it was a fluke or a true return to normal next season. Take care guys.
ST // November 23, 2009 at 7:23 am |
Losing games like this at RU should not surprise anyone, especially the fans. Go back 20 years, RU beats Penn State and follows that up with a loss to Temple. About 5 years later, RU needed an easy win over Cincy (yes, remember) to get to a bowl, and fumbled that away. And a few years back, they beat Mich St to just lose to a Div 1 AA team the following week. It’s the same old RU. They will break our hearts everytime it looks like we are going to turn the corner. With this schedule, 8 wins is easy. 9 wins would be good, and 10-3 would be very good. Unfortunately, the fans expect so much more because we just want to get something besides a meaningless Bowl banner to hang up.
JerseyJoe // November 23, 2009 at 9:31 am |
No sugar coating this…that lose to Syracuase – and really it was more HOW they lost – speaks volumes about how far away the RU program really is.
However, when viewed with some perspective things are not as bad as they seemed late Saturday afternoon. Win or lose, that game meant nothing in the overall Big East picture for Rutgers.
In terms of bowl implications, Rutgers was never playing for the Gator Bowl anyway (being realistic here). At this point, there is no significant difference between the remaining bowls in play for RU. The Big East pools all bowl payouts together anyway and redistributes amongst the football bowl teams anyway.
I would like to think that the very young Rutgers team will learn something from this loss, but I cannot honestly say that. This is a pattern with the program that extends beyond the current class. In my eyes, it’s not a talent question – it’s squarely a coaching issue.
When Schiano talks about consistency, games like Saturday are what must be lurking in his mind.
wskrides // November 23, 2009 at 11:00 am |
JerseyJoe… i quote:
“However, when viewed with some perspective things are not as bad as they seemed late Saturday afternoon. Win or lose, that game meant nothing in the overall Big East picture for Rutgers.”
i agree with everything you say minus the above. it’s not only about this year’s Big East picture, it’s also hugely about PERCEPTION. that’s what elevates a program to prominence and every time rutgers seems to be on the cusp of getting somewhere near there, they lay a huge rotten, inexcusable egg…
Dave // November 23, 2009 at 11:11 am |
Sec117 Well done, that might be the most honest and best post I’ve read on BS ever.
JerseyJoe // November 23, 2009 at 11:40 am |
wskrides – I understand your point, but well have to see how the rest of the season unfolds.
If RU implodes the rest of the season, then the Syracuse game will be more than an ugly blemish from this season. However, if RU beats Louisville and then pulls out a win at home against WVU – the Syracuse game will be relegated to nothing more than ‘what-if” scenarios.
I view the Syracuse lose more as in indictment of the program’s already existing reality – they are inconsistent. That fact won’t derail any of the progress RU has made over the last 9+ years. It will however, prevent them from ever getting to the next level.
Losing to Syracuse is going to have minimal, if any, impact on recruiting, et. al.
What the Syracuse game showed more than anything is that Rutgers has not progressed beyond their current-state equilibrium of inconsistent play. And even with that crutch all these years, RU still is able to compete in recruiting, increase fund raising, etc.
Losing to Syracuse doesn’t signal the end…it simply re-emphasizes what we already knew: the coaching staff has not yet figured out how to maintain consistent performance throughout a full season.
RUinChiTown // November 23, 2009 at 5:23 pm |
A few thoughts after applying the “48 Hour Rule” (24 hours just wasn’t enough this time.)…
We were out prepared and out coached on game day–reminded me of an Edsall team vs, RU a few years ago.
Two words come to mind…New Hampshire. All the same build-up before and all the miserable let-down afterwards.
I’m glad it wasn’t on TV. I would have put a shoe through mine half way through Q3.
It only really hurts if it disqualifies us from the Gator now that UConn did their part for us.
What off the radar, underpaying , in a boring city bowl do we go to this time? (Can’t even imagine thinking this ten years ago when 8-4 was only a fantasy.)
mannyru // November 23, 2009 at 9:00 pm |
Face it–notwithstanding the victories over UCONN and SF, this team has not yet established an identity as an offensive team–power running, or spread offense, or whatever. They rely on turnovers and trick plays, and at the end of games had some nicer runs. But in the end, the offense coordinators haven’t put young frosh Savage in a place to succeed–less passes, more establish the run, and then play action. Instead, its the shotgun play after play after play, and he clearly could not handle the blitzes. Second, why is it so hard for GS to ‘adapt’ during a game? Its like they come out with an offensive or defensive game plan and aren’t allow to coach during the game. GS talked about the great job Marrone did in preparing his team…ok–so that should last for two series, and then we adapt. Did we? Did we in Cincinatti? Not here or there.
GS runs a good program–gets good kids who apparently go to class and graduate. Many of our competition can’t say that–and he wins games–but he hasn’t yet learned how to be elite. One year we had the magic….but we haven’t been able to capture the ability to win when we shouldn’t–to make second and third string players play above their heads when its their chance…to create a system that is plug and play rather than based on one great player. To me, that’s the failing. (Of course, FHill can’t even coach players, much less great ones. Wake me up when someone enjoys watching an RU basketball game (win or loss, and moreover, when the players look like they are enjoying it as well).
tmaaac // November 24, 2009 at 12:44 am |
As one of the writers above mentioned
tmaaac // November 24, 2009 at 12:52 am |
Go Rutgar, beet d’ville. Don’t let no ‘Cuse stuff get you down. Da refs stole game frum us or sumin’ like dat. Long aswe keep spendin’ mo dan anybod’ in da confrence on foosball yet can’t even finish 2nd, much less 3rd, it be embarressin. Bring back Mulcaheehee, to sked mo cupcake. How ’bout an RU Bowl wit only creampuffs invited? Play it outdoors in Maine!
Dave // November 24, 2009 at 9:39 am |
Does that comment above come with subtitles?